Open Science Repository Mathematics

doi: 10.7392/openaccess.70081985


The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis


Werner Raab

Professor, Dr. phil., retired member of the Mathematical Institute of the University of Bonn, Germany


Abstract

It is proposed to show that the reciprocal of the Riemann zeta-function is holomorphic in the complex half-plane on the right of the abscissa 1/2.

Keywords: Riemann hypothesis.



Citation: Raab, W. (2013). The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), e70081985. doi:10.7392/openaccess.70081985

Received: July 3, 2013

Published: July 6, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Raab, W. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Contact: research@open-science-repository.com



Full text

Other download options: cloud 2; cloud 3.

You don't have a PDF plugin, but you can download the PDF file.


Cite this paper

APA

Raab, W. (2013). The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), e70081985. doi:10.7392/openaccess.70081985

MLA

Raab, Werner. “The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis.” Open Science Repository Mathematics Online.open-access (2013): e70081985.

Chicago

Raab, Werner. 2013. “The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis.” Open Science Repository Mathematics Online (open-access): e70081985. doi:10.7392/openaccess.70081985. http://www.open-science-repository.com/mathematics-70081985.html.

Harvard

Raab, W., 2013. The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), p.e70081985. Available at: http://www.open-science-repository.com/mathematics-70081985.html.

Science

1. W. Raab, The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis, Open Science Repository Mathematics Online, e70081985 (2013).

Nature

1. Raab, W. The Truth of the Riemann Hypothesis. Open Science Repository Mathematics Online, e70081985 (2013).


doi

Research registered in the DOI resolution system as: 10.7392/openaccess.70081985.


Submit an open review for this paper

Instructions

Main criteria reviewers should evaluate are: originality, sound methodology and data, following of universal ethical principles, scientific relevance and clear description of problems, hypotheses and results.

Names, affiliations of reviewers and personal contacts should be included at the end of the text.

Maximum text length is 10000 characters. Only serious, consistent and original reviews are accepted.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.