Open Science Repository Economics

doi: 10.7392/openaccess.23050448


The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle” is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot


Szabolcs Szekeres

Budapest, Hungary, ORCID 0000-0003-3903-5377


Abstract

The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle” refers to the observation that, when interest rates are uncertain, the expected values of discount factors and compound factors for a pair of present and future values yield different certainty-equivalent discount rates, which are either decreasing or increasing as a function of time, and either tend to the lowest or to the highest possible interest rate. There were many attempts to both resolve this apparent paradox and to justify the conclusion that discount rates should be declining in the long term, but none explained why the certainty-equivalents diverge. The cause of the divergence was found to be Weitzman’s incorrect formulation of the expected discount factor in his 1998 article. Correcting for this, the puzzle disappears, and Weitzman’s model shows that discount rates should be increasing in the long term. However, the entire question is moot, as it depends on annual interest rates displaying nearly perfect autocorrelation.

Keywords: discount rate, uncertainty, declining discount rate, benefit-cost analysis.



Citation: Szekeres, S. (2013). The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot. Open Science Repository Economics, Online(open-access), e23050448. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050448

Received: October 28, 2103

Published: October 31, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Szekeres, S. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Contact: research@open-science-repository.com



Full text

Other download options: cloud 2; cloud 3.

You don't have a PDF plugin, but you can download the PDF file.


Cite this paper

APA

Szekeres, S. (2013). The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot. Open Science Repository Economics, Online(open-access), e23050448. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050448

MLA

Szekeres, Szabolcs. “The ‘Weitzman-Gollier Puzzle' Is Not a Paradox but a Mistake, and It Is Most Likely Moot.” Open Science Repository Economics Online.open-access (2013): e23050448.

Chicago

Szekeres, Szabolcs. “The ‘Weitzman-Gollier Puzzle' Is Not a Paradox but a Mistake, and It Is Most Likely Moot.” Open Science Repository Economics Online, no. open-access (October 31, 2013): e23050448. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050448.

Harvard

Szekeres, S., 2013. The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot. Open Science Repository Economics, Online(open-access), p.e23050448.

Science

1. S. Szekeres, The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot, Open Sci. Repos. Econ. Online, e23050448 (2013).

Nature

1. Szekeres, S. The “Weitzman-Gollier puzzle" is not a paradox but a mistake, and it is most likely moot. Open Sci. Repos. Econ. Online, e23050448 (2013).


doi

Research registered in the DOI resolution system as: 10.7392/openaccess.23050448.


Submit an open review for this paper

Instructions

Main criteria reviewers should evaluate are: originality, sound methodology and data, following of universal ethical principles, scientific relevance and clear description of problems, hypotheses and results.

Names, affiliations of reviewers and personal contacts should be included at the end of the text.

Maximum text length is 10000 characters. Only serious, consistent and original reviews are accepted.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.