Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences

doi: 10.7392/openaccess.23050469


Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET


Bijan Paul [1], Aditi Roy [2], Mohammed J. Islam [2]

[1] Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Asia Pacific, Dhaka, Bangladesh; [2]  Dept. of Computer Science and Engineering, Shahjalal University of Science and Technology, Sylhet, Bangladesh


Abstract

VANET (Vehicular Ad-hoc Network) is a new technology which has taken enormous attention. Because of some unique properties which makes it different from other adhoc network. There are two types of topology based routing protocols in VANET proactive and reactive. The performance of routing protocols can vary with the various parameters such as speed, pause time, node density and traffic scenarios. Hence in this research we mainly focus on VANET topology based routing protocols. The performance of reactive (AODV, DSR) and proactive (DSDV) has been analyzed by means of packet delivery ratio, loss packet ratio & average end-to-end delay with varying pause time and node density under TCP & CBR connection.

Keywords: VANET, AODV, DSR, DSDV, TCP, CBR, Packet Delivery Ratio, Average End-to-End Delay, Loss Packet Ratio.



Citation: Paul, B., Roy, A., & Islam, M. J. (2013). Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET. Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences, Online(open-access), e23050469. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050469

Received: November 26, 2013.

Published: December 9, 2013

Copyright: © 2013 Paul, B., Roy, A., & Islam, M. J. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Contact: research@open-science-repository.com



Full text

Move mouse to the bottom of the paper to resize or print. If you are using a mobile browser with no support for PDF files, you can download this paper. Other download options: cloud 2; cloud 3.


Cite this paper

APA

Paul, B., Roy, A., & Islam, M. J. (2013). Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET. Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences, Online(open-access), e23050469. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050469

MLA

Paul, Bijan, Aditi Roy, and Mohammed J. Islam. “Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with Varying Pause Time and Node Density over TCP and CBR Connections in VANET.” Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences Online.open-access (2013): e23050469.

Chicago

Paul, Bijan, Aditi Roy, and Mohammed J. Islam. “Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with Varying Pause Time and Node Density over TCP and CBR Connections in VANET.” Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences Online, no. open-access (December 09, 2013): e23050469. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050469.

Harvard

Paul, B., Roy, A. & Islam, M.J., 2013. Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET. Open Science Repository Computer and Information Sciences, Online(open-access), p.e23050469.

Science

1. B. Paul, A. Roy, M. J. Islam, Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET, Open Sci. Repos. Comput. Inf. Sci. Online, e23050469 (2013).

Nature

1. Paul, B., Roy, A. & Islam, M. J. Comparison of DSR, AODV and DSDV Routing Protocols with varying pause time and node density over TCP and CBR connections in VANET. Open Sci. Repos. Comput. Inf. Sci. Online, e23050469 (2013).


doi

Research registered in the DOI resolution system as: 10.7392/openaccess.23050469.


Submit an open review for this paper

Instructions

Main criteria reviewers should evaluate are: originality, sound methodology and data, following of universal ethical principles, scientific relevance and clear description of problems, hypotheses and results.

Names, affiliations of reviewers and personal contacts should be included at the end of the text.

Maximum text length is 10000 characters. Only serious, consistent and original reviews are accepted.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.