Open Science Repository Agriculture

doi: 10.7392/openaccess.23050496


Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines


Nelson S. Latap

College of Agriculture and Forestry, Ifugao State University, Philippines


Abstract

The current economic analysis, long term cost and external cost of grazing systems in the three provinces of Northern Luzon, Philippines were updated. Economic analysis using simple economic analysis, net present value (NPV) and payback period (PP) showed that continuous-silvipastoral grazing system is more economically viable than continuous-conventional system. All things being equal, the study shows that continuous-silvipastoral system seems to be the better of the two grazing systems in this region of study.

Universal Soil loss Equation (USLE) was used to determine the long term cost. Analysis showed that continuous-silvipastoral system resulted in a higher soil erosion rate with 128.73 t/ha/yr as compared with lower erosion rate of 40.68 t/ha/yr of the continuous conventional system. Several factors have contributed to this, among others: the slope, stocking rate and area covered by the grazing systems.

External cost is largely contributed by the continuous-silvipastoral system with a larger (48.61 m³/ha/yr) amount of sediments compounded to the lower (9.97 m³/ha/yr) amount from the continuous-conventional grazing system. Based from NIPPON KOI Co., Ltd study (2004) and NPC (2003), continuous-conventional grazing system can reduce the life span of the Magat dam by 0.88 years per year of grazing. Likewise, continuous-silvicultural system can potentially reduce the life span by 4.29 years for a period of one year grazing practice.

Combined the total effect of sediment discharge brought about by the different grazing systems existing within the watershed shortens the service life of the Magat Dam by 5.17 years per year of grazing period.

Keywords: Grazing System, external cost, net present value (NPV), payback period (PP), universal soil loss equation model (USLE), Magat Watershed, Pasture Lease Agreement (PLA), IDRISI, Geographical Information System (GIS).

.


Citation: Latap, N. S. (2014). Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines. Open Science Repository Agriculture, Online(open-access), e23050496. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050496

Received: February 12, 2014

Published: February 17, 2014

Copyright: © 2014 Latap, N. S. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.

Contact: research@open-science-repository.com



Full text

Other options: cloud 2; cloud 3.

You don't have a PDF plugin, but you can download the PDF file.


Cite this paper

APA

Latap, N. S. (2014). Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines. Open Science Repository Agriculture, Online(open-access), e23050496. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050496

MLA

Latap, Nelson S. “Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines.” Open Science Repository Agriculture Online.open-access (2014): e23050496.

Chicago

Latap, Nelson S. “Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines.” Open Science Repository Agriculture Online, no. open-access (February 17, 2014): e23050496. doi:10.7392/openaccess.23050496.

Harvard

Latap, N.S., 2014. Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines. Open Science Repository Agriculture, Online(open-access), p.e23050496.

Science

1. N. S. Latap, Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines, Open Sci. Repos. Agric. Online, e23050496 (2014).

Nature

1. Latap, N. S. Economic Analysis of Grazing Practices Along Magat Watershed in Northern Philippines. Open Sci. Repos. Agric. Online, e23050496 (2014).


doi

Research registered in the DOI resolution system as: 10.7392/openaccess.23050496.


Submit an open review for this paper

Instructions

Main criteria reviewers should evaluate are: originality, sound methodology and data, following of universal ethical principles, scientific relevance and clear description of problems, hypotheses and results.

Names, affiliations of reviewers and personal contacts should be included at the end of the text.

Maximum text length is 10000 characters. Only serious, consistent and original reviews are accepted.



Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.