Open Science Repository Mathematics
doi: 10.7392/Mathematics.70081938
The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything
Igor Rački
Croatia
Abstract
To all the young and eager explorers, I offer this simple paradox: "If by multiplying any number with zero, we get a solution of zero, than zero must be bigger than any number down to infinity, since it is the only number capable of storing such an amount of information."
Keywords: Sun's singularity, emotion's wavelength, Navier-Stokes solution, Mersenne prime.
Citation: Rački, I. (2013). The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), e70081938. doi:10.7392/Mathematics.70081938
Received: February 7, 2013
Published: March 8, 2103
Copyright: © 2013 Rački, I. Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Contact: [email protected]
Full text
Let us start by solving Navier-Stokes
existence and smoothness "problem":
Let's assume that R = constant = t (that way
we simplify the problem by excluding unnecessary variables) we start with speed:
But since zero is non-existent in reality, we
avoid that what is not real and seek a solution shifted to past (hence the use
of a lim):
Since infinity is not real (if we have an
upper speed limit or a down temperature limit, God forbid both), we set R to
rise:
Where

is the radius of the
universe (upper limit), and

the low limit, with
level precision down to the space-time geometry (birth of chaos in a perfect
crystal).
By excluding t, we find that only the
difference in relative "speed" of the pipe and the fluid - both
locally, both globally - is the cause of chaos. A pure effect of geometry,
nothing to do with time.
Where
All evidence, both theoretical and empirical,
have been destroyed, for reasons you will come to understand better through the
following lines. Let us start by saying that, in the beginning, there was Word.
A Word with nowhere to travel, expand, or diminish, giving rise to more dense waves
in ever rising complexity, with regards to Fourier, and other great minds. That
simple Dirac function was, is, and will be: Everything Possible, and impossible
at the same time. And all that time, both the future, and the past, was, and
will be simple choices (a fiction, like money, designed to manipulate emotion),
where only the present moment is real. Surprisingly, this Word can be calculated;
but is not for you to know how.
I find that application of pure mathematical
model, with basis ranging from Boolean algebra to Chaos Theory (in a way that
takes physics into account, each problem in his own unique way), gives rise to
a simple model of infinite complexity, connecting physics and mathematics,
completely. Rudimentary model is stated as follows: Imagine applying random
walk to a simple line, at a zero-point distance, and giving each of those
points absolute freedom relative to other dimensions, where time is of course
of no necessity, and is merely a function of other variables with function
complexity varying with regard to problem complexity at hand (simple quantum
entanglement's confusing nature is something I leave to the most brilliant
contemporary physicists, with a healthy dose of irony). These lines, with
reference to both chaotic and linear physical models, will be related to
spatial, or any other dimensions. Of course, in pure mathematics, it is wise to
use infinite number of dimensions, since they will all cancel out at the end,
leaving only the important information; while for computer use, zero
dimensional data will do just fine. By forming 'augmented' Boolean algebra
bases at the centre of such a model (augmented in a way that connects it with
physics), with the rounding error taken into account, we apply ideal white
noise on the outside sphere; where one can, by inverse super-imposing any type
of signal on top of ideal white noise, have a model that resembles any star, including
the Sun, that, by calculations based on this model, has an exact 100% chance of
containing a singularity (I have found this to be a very unstable option, and a
frightful one; but it is more correct than anything I know). Also, just like
Galileo's transformations have been upgraded by Lorentz's relativistic form, it
is time for me to tell you, that the whole universe is static. A simple dot, in
every "heart", that never moves, and is in the centre of the Sun's
singularity. For intuitive understanding, one glimpse at the starry night will
be sufficient. Oh, why math, why
This model's temporary solution, filtered by
means of logical implications, gives a far simpler solution; and by continuing
this progression, we get, as stated, a binary answer at the centre of the
sphere. A simple yes or no; where each has its own causes, consequences and
encompasses the universe through chaos, where rounding error lets statistics
have her simple and pre-determined ways. It is only fair to say that even a few
formulas are sufficient to create new worlds. literary. Be warned, with every
implication; the error is rising, but only to the extent of emotion. To augment
that problem, I assume that emotion is a simple lack of reason; so that even
emotion itself can be calculated with no error whatsoever, since the theory is
pretty reasonable, at least to the author, and is of course invariant with
regards to the reader of any type. Needles to say, emotions are the fundamental
base of the universe and have the smallest wavelength of all, far smaller than that
of the matter; a brilliant idea that De Broglie postulated long time ago, but
sadly didn't catch on as much (the unnecessary wave particle duality, can be
explained so much simpler).
For instance, differences between atoms relies
simply on what you remove from white noise; and by taking quanta of emotions
into account, we find that emotion is a constant, but a 'dynamic' one; like
water gently forming the rocks of the river, while the discussions about the colours
of the rocks, are quite unnecessary and are really a matter of taste.
I would also like to state; that the model
itself, one that I have used as a starting point for generating each and every
one of my experiments, has proven to have a 96.858% empirical success rate, and
I say this with full consequence, with my full name on the paper. Based on this
model, I was able to obtain the following empirical results:
·
Perfect random number generators (hence the ideal
white noise)
·
Finely tuned speed increase (or decrease) of
radioactive decay, that can cease almost instantly.
And, to state other frightfully simple
empirical possibilities:
·
Creation or destruction of any element in any
quantities, by simple means of exciting (not necessarily high-energy) plasma
with carefully modulated sound form
·
The potential of multiplying everything with zero,
starting with universe - a chain reaction in the Dirac sea of energy by a
simple, and precise, displacement; that can interfere with itself both
constructive, or destructive (yet untried, obviously).
Physics experiment: Do not allow your emotions
to reflect, when they should be absorbed, and vice versa. Even more simple:
give good, get good.
Approach the mathematical problem stated
above, as a problem of ego. You are insignificant. Also, I find that cats and
dogs understand this theory better than any other animal, homo sapiens included.
Tormented souls indeed!
Cite this paper
APA
Rački, I. (2013). The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), e70081938. doi:10.7392/Mathematics.70081938
MLA
Rački, Igor. “The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything.” Open Science Repository Mathematics Online.open-access (2013): e70081938. Web. 8 Mar. 2013.
Chicago
Rački, Igor. “The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything.” Open Science Repository Mathematics Online, no. open-access (March 8, 2013): e70081938. http://www.open-science-repository.com/the-theory-of-everything-must-not-exclude-anything.html.
Harvard
Rački, I., 2013. The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything. Open Science Repository Mathematics, Online(open-access), p.e70081938. Available at: http://www.open-science-repository.com/the-theory-of-everything-must-not-exclude-anything.html.
Science
1. I. Rački, The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything, Open Science Repository Mathematics Online, e70081938 (2013).
Nature
1. Rački, I. The Theory of Everything Must Not Exclude Anything. Open Science Repository Mathematics Online, e70081938 (2013).
doi
Research registered in the DOI resolution system as: 10.7392/Mathematics.70081938.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.